-37.7%
RBLX vs NIO
-91.3%
+53.6%
-82.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.6% | +5.9% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +12.4% | -13.0% | +25.4% | +17.2% |
| 30D | +19.7% | -18.3% | +38.0% | +27.1% |
| 3M | -0.1% | -33.2% | +33.1% | +12.6% |
| 6M | -35.7% | -21.5% | -14.3% | -32.5% |
| YTD | -46.6% | -25.5% | -21.1% | -43.1% |
| 1Y | -66.6% | -38.0% | -28.6% | -63.1% |
| 3Y | +52.3% | -65.5% | +117.7% | +82.4% |
| 5Y | -47.7% | -90.6% | +42.8% | -5.4% |
| All | -37.7% | -91.3% | +53.6% | +8.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling