+55.9%
RBLX vs NIO
-64.4%
+120.3%
-74.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -2.4% | +1.7% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +8.0% | -4.1% | +12.2% | +8.5% |
| 30D | +20.2% | -23.2% | +43.4% | +23.8% |
| 3M | +3.5% | -29.9% | +33.5% | +7.7% |
| 6M | -28.9% | -25.1% | -3.8% | -26.8% |
| YTD | -45.1% | -27.5% | -17.6% | -43.3% |
| 1Y | -66.2% | -41.1% | -25.1% | -64.6% |
| All | +55.9% | -64.4% | +120.3% | +80.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling