+10.2%
PYPL vs NIO
-60.1%
+70.3%
-57.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -4.9% | +6.6% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -14.5% | +14.5% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +5.7% | -15.0% | +20.6% | +7.6% |
| 3M | -1.9% | -35.6% | +33.6% | +3.0% |
| 6M | +31.8% | -55.7% | +87.5% | +44.3% |
| YTD | +2.4% | -43.1% | +45.6% | +7.9% |
| 1Y | -8.2% | -53.5% | +45.3% | -0.9% |
| 3Y | +10.2% | -59.8% | +70.0% | +15.0% |
| All | +10.2% | -60.1% | +70.3% | +15.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling