+28.9%
PYPL vs NIO
-33.7%
+62.6%
-15.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -1.6% | -1.5% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -13.0% | +15.7% | +2.4% |
| 30D | -4.9% | -18.3% | +13.4% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +28.9% | -33.2% | +62.1% | +28.0% |
| All | +28.9% | -33.7% | +62.6% | +28.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling