+499.6%
PLTR vs NIO
-92.1%
+591.6%
-77.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | +5.9% | -2.5% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -12.9% | +5.6% | -18.5% | -14.4% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -4.2% | -13.1% | -16.2% |
| 3M | +2.9% | -26.3% | +29.2% | +13.5% |
| 6M | +19.9% | -42.5% | +62.4% | +41.8% |
| YTD | -9.8% | -33.5% | +23.8% | -0.7% |
| 1Y | -8.4% | -52.7% | +44.3% | +12.7% |
| 3Y | +765.0% | -57.5% | +822.5% | +857.7% |
| All | +499.6% | -92.1% | +591.6% | +1,024.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling