-9.7%
PLTR vs NIO
-53.4%
+43.7%
-44.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -1.2% | +3.3% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -1.8% | +2.2% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -17.5% | -6.6% | -10.9% | -16.6% |
| 3M | -1.5% | -29.9% | +28.4% | +3.0% |
| 6M | +25.9% | -46.6% | +72.6% | +33.9% |
| YTD | -3.0% | -36.5% | +33.5% | +3.0% |
| 1Y | -9.7% | -51.1% | +41.4% | +6.4% |
| All | -9.7% | -53.4% | +43.7% | +6.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling