+308.3%
PLTR vs NBIS
+1,484.3%
-1,176.0%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +7.5% | -12.0% | -5.6% |
| 7D | -6.4% | +8.2% | -14.6% | -7.6% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +3.4% | +6.7% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +23.0% | -12.8% | +35.8% | +21.0% |
| 6M | +13.8% | +131.5% | -117.7% | -9.9% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +170.5% | -172.4% | -25.8% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | +248.8% | -237.1% | -22.4% |
| All | +308.3% | +1,484.3% | -1,176.0% | +147.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling