+293.4%
PLTR vs NBIS
+710.9%
-417.5%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -9.9% | +7.8% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -10.5% | +15.3% | +6.0% |
| 30D | -16.4% | -37.7% | +21.3% | -11.0% |
| 3M | -6.2% | -54.6% | +48.4% | +3.7% |
| 6M | +29.2% | -44.1% | +73.3% | +32.5% |
| YTD | -5.5% | +38.4% | -43.9% | -22.0% |
| 1Y | -2.4% | +30.7% | -33.2% | -19.1% |
| All | +293.4% | +710.9% | -417.5% | +160.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling