+297.0%
PLTR vs NBIS
+1,581.9%
-1,284.9%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.4% | +1.0% | -0.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +17.8% | -17.7% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +30.5% | -33.8% | -8.5% |
| 3M | +28.4% | +9.2% | +19.2% | +21.5% |
| 6M | +8.4% | +153.2% | -144.8% | -15.4% |
| YTD | -4.6% | +187.1% | -191.8% | -28.5% |
| 1Y | +4.4% | +151.1% | -146.7% | -20.9% |
| All | +297.0% | +1,581.9% | -1,284.9% | +138.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling