-77.5%
PLTD vs LCID
-80.6%
+3.1%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +1.7% | +2.9% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -6.6% | +12.5% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -11.6% | -30.1% | +18.5% | -16.9% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -17.6% | -12.3% | -30.3% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -54.4% | +25.9% | -37.0% |
| YTD | -20.4% | -55.7% | +35.3% | -29.5% |
| 1Y | -33.3% | -71.0% | +37.8% | -45.4% |
| All | -77.5% | -80.6% | +3.1% | -81.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling