-77.7%
PLTD vs LCID
-86.5%
+8.8%
-83.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -11.3% | +11.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -9.8% | +9.2% | -19.0% | -7.9% |
| 30D | +18.9% | -3.0% | +21.9% | +19.6% |
| 3M | -4.2% | -50.2% | +46.0% | -14.0% |
| 6M | -34.8% | -45.8% | +11.0% | -38.9% |
| YTD | -21.1% | -69.2% | +48.1% | -33.5% |
| 1Y | -19.3% | -80.4% | +61.1% | -38.3% |
| All | -77.7% | -86.5% | +8.8% | -82.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling