+238.0%
ONTO vs LSCC
+82.7%
+155.3%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +2.0% | +4.2% | +4.8% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +1.3% | -2.3% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -9.7% | +6.8% | +4.6% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -23.7% | +21.3% | +19.9% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +26.5% | +1.7% | +13.8% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +57.5% | +12.3% | +28.9% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +75.7% | +87.2% | +84.5% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | +19.5% | +76.5% | +61.0% |
| All | +238.0% | +82.7% | +155.3% | +84.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling