+54.8%
ONTO vs LSCC
+85.2%
-30.4%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.7% | +1.3% | -9.9% | -9.6% |
| 7D | -17.4% | +3.0% | -20.3% | -19.4% |
| 30D | -43.2% | -19.3% | -23.9% | -34.1% |
| 3M | -35.7% | -22.3% | -13.5% | -23.1% |
| 6M | -38.3% | -14.6% | -23.7% | -29.2% |
| YTD | +17.1% | +45.8% | -28.7% | -4.0% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | +69.6% | -26.5% | +6.5% |
| All | +54.8% | +85.2% | -30.4% | -1.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling