+30.7%
ONTO vs LSCC
+69.3%
-38.6%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.6% | -8.6% | -7.0% | -9.5% |
| 7D | -29.7% | -4.8% | -24.9% | -27.0% |
| 30D | -50.3% | -27.1% | -23.2% | -37.5% |
| 3M | -43.5% | -23.6% | -19.9% | -30.9% |
| 6M | -48.9% | -19.8% | -29.0% | -38.0% |
| YTD | -1.2% | +33.2% | -34.4% | -13.1% |
| 1Y | +14.9% | +55.2% | -40.3% | -8.3% |
| All | +30.7% | +69.3% | -38.6% | -11.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling