+658.6%
ONTO vs ARMK
+92.5%
+566.0%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -0.9% | +7.0% | +6.6% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -2.4% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -2.9% | 0.0% | -2.9% | -2.8% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +6.7% | -9.1% | -5.1% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +38.8% | -10.6% | +10.3% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +55.2% | +14.6% | +38.7% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +46.6% | +116.3% | +119.8% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | +112.9% | -17.0% | +38.7% |
| 5Y | +244.5% | +144.0% | +100.5% | +131.7% |
| All | +658.6% | +92.5% | +566.0% | +590.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling