+30.7%
ONTO vs ARMK
+83.8%
-53.1%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.6% | -3.9% | -11.7% | -12.8% |
| 7D | -29.7% | -10.2% | -19.5% | -23.5% |
| 30D | -50.3% | -9.3% | -41.0% | -46.2% |
| 3M | -43.5% | -11.4% | -32.1% | -37.8% |
| 6M | -48.9% | +11.6% | -60.5% | -51.8% |
| YTD | -1.2% | +37.5% | -38.7% | -19.3% |
| 1Y | +14.9% | +34.9% | -20.0% | -5.3% |
| All | +30.7% | +83.8% | -53.1% | -13.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling