+99.7%
ONTO vs ARMK
+114.7%
-15.0%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -0.9% | +7.0% | +6.7% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -2.4% | +1.4% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -2.9% | 0.0% | -2.9% | -2.8% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +6.7% | -9.1% | -6.1% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +38.8% | -10.6% | +3.6% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +55.2% | +14.6% | +27.1% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +46.6% | +116.3% | +103.7% |
| All | +99.7% | +114.7% | -15.0% | +22.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling