+91.8%
OKTA vs NIO
-62.3%
+154.1%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -0.3% | -1.5% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -6.7% | +7.4% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +13.0% | -20.0% | +33.0% | +15.5% |
| 3M | +43.4% | -30.5% | +73.9% | +48.5% |
| 6M | +107.6% | -20.7% | +128.3% | +111.4% |
| YTD | +93.8% | -25.7% | +119.5% | +98.0% |
| 1Y | +80.8% | -38.6% | +119.4% | +88.0% |
| 3Y | +91.8% | -62.3% | +154.1% | +113.2% |
| All | +91.8% | -62.3% | +154.1% | +113.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling