+81.1%
OKTA vs NIO
-36.7%
+117.8%
-33.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +3.1% | -5.8% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -2.9% | +0.5% | -2.2% |
| 30D | +13.0% | -18.7% | +31.8% | +15.0% |
| 3M | +41.7% | -29.4% | +71.1% | +45.6% |
| 6M | +105.9% | -32.5% | +138.5% | +111.7% |
| YTD | +92.6% | -27.6% | +120.2% | +98.4% |
| 1Y | +81.1% | -39.2% | +120.3% | +96.9% |
| All | +81.1% | -36.7% | +117.8% | +96.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling