+177.4%
NXT vs ENPH
-83.6%
+261.0%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.2% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -2.4% | +1.3% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -15.3% | -6.6% | -8.7% | -13.1% |
| 3M | -43.8% | -46.8% | +3.0% | -29.7% |
| 6M | -18.7% | -14.7% | -3.9% | -15.7% |
| YTD | -3.0% | +13.5% | -16.5% | -12.5% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | -0.4% | +23.1% | +14.8% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | -71.7% | +167.7% | +164.5% |
| All | +177.4% | -83.6% | +261.0% | +323.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling