+92.7%
NXT vs ENPH
-70.0%
+162.7%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | -5.4% | +1.8% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.2% | +3.4% | -3.6% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -20.0% | -10.3% | -9.7% | -16.7% |
| 3M | -30.9% | -31.4% | +0.4% | -21.1% |
| 6M | -23.8% | -10.1% | -13.7% | -22.5% |
| YTD | -5.4% | +14.6% | -20.0% | -15.1% |
| 1Y | +28.0% | -3.2% | +31.3% | +21.1% |
| All | +92.7% | -70.0% | +162.7% | +146.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling