+707.3%
NVDL vs HTZ
-85.8%
+793.1%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +1.3% | +0.3% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +11.7% | +7.5% | +4.2% | +11.7% |
| 30D | +7.8% | +47.4% | -39.6% | +8.0% |
| 3M | +3.3% | -54.9% | +58.2% | +3.3% |
| 6M | +38.9% | -47.0% | +85.9% | +39.3% |
| YTD | +28.5% | -55.3% | +83.7% | +28.7% |
| 1Y | +40.6% | -57.6% | +98.2% | +41.4% |
| All | +707.3% | -85.8% | +793.1% | +726.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling