+34.0%
NVDL vs HTZ
-65.3%
+99.3%
-42.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -5.3% | +3.5% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -10.4% | +9.6% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -2.4% | +5.8% | +3.5% |
| 3M | +8.1% | -60.9% | +69.0% | +10.2% |
| 6M | +31.9% | -50.2% | +82.1% | +34.8% |
| YTD | +21.1% | -59.7% | +80.8% | +23.8% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -66.0% | +100.1% | +43.5% |
| All | +34.0% | -65.3% | +99.3% | +43.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling