+2,622.7%
NVDL vs BLDR
-11.0%
+2,633.8%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -1.9% | +0.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.7% | +1.9% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -14.7% | +18.1% | +9.8% |
| 3M | +8.1% | -20.8% | +28.9% | +17.4% |
| 6M | +31.9% | -35.3% | +67.2% | +55.4% |
| YTD | +21.1% | -40.3% | +61.4% | +45.1% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -56.3% | +90.3% | +83.2% |
| 3Y | +677.9% | -56.1% | +734.1% | +867.8% |
| All | +2,622.7% | -11.0% | +2,633.8% | +1,354.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling