+651.2%
NVDL vs BLDR
-58.1%
+709.3%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -3.9% | -0.8% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -8.7% | -8.1% | -0.6% | -5.6% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -21.5% | +20.2% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +11.4% | -21.0% | +32.3% | +20.1% |
| 6M | +22.9% | -37.1% | +59.9% | +44.6% |
| YTD | +15.4% | -42.7% | +58.1% | +38.5% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | -58.0% | +76.7% | +61.5% |
| All | +651.2% | -58.1% | +709.3% | +846.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling