-99.2%
NVD vs HTZ
-86.7%
-12.5%
-99.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +1.3% | -2.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -11.1% | +7.5% | -18.6% | -11.1% |
| 30D | -13.3% | +47.4% | -60.7% | -13.3% |
| 3M | -19.8% | -54.9% | +35.1% | -19.8% |
| 6M | -48.8% | -47.0% | -1.8% | -48.9% |
| YTD | -49.7% | -55.3% | +5.6% | -49.8% |
| 1Y | -61.4% | -57.6% | -3.7% | -61.5% |
| 3Y | -99.1% | -86.6% | -12.5% | -99.2% |
| All | -99.2% | -86.7% | -12.5% | -99.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling