-98.3%
NVD vs HTZ
-82.4%
-16.0%
-99.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -2.6% | +6.5% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +28.6% | -8.5% | +37.2% | +28.5% |
| 30D | +73.6% | -18.9% | +92.5% | +72.8% |
| 3M | +70.1% | -36.0% | +106.1% | +69.3% |
| 6M | +53.6% | -74.6% | +128.2% | +53.8% |
| YTD | -7.0% | -70.8% | +63.8% | -7.4% |
| 1Y | -9.0% | -75.3% | +66.3% | -9.0% |
| 3Y | -98.3% | -81.6% | -16.8% | -98.3% |
| All | -98.3% | -82.4% | -16.0% | -98.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling