+87.6%
NTRA vs FIGR
+1.6%
+86.1%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -4.1% | +2.8% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +1.0% | -1.5% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.3% | +31.4% | -27.1% | +2.0% |
| 3M | +50.6% | +30.3% | +20.4% | +47.0% |
| 6M | +63.9% | -7.6% | +71.6% | +62.8% |
| YTD | +42.4% | -10.5% | +52.8% | +38.7% |
| All | +87.6% | +1.6% | +86.1% | +74.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling