+89.2%
NTRA vs FIGR
-3.1%
+92.4%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -4.6% | +5.5% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -3.0% | +3.3% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +4.1% | +13.7% | -9.6% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +50.0% | +23.9% | +26.2% | +47.0% |
| 6M | +67.3% | -8.4% | +75.7% | +66.3% |
| YTD | +43.6% | -14.6% | +58.2% | +40.3% |
| 1Y | +89.2% | +12.1% | +77.2% | +76.2% |
| All | +89.2% | -3.1% | +92.4% | +76.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling