+497.4%
NTRA vs ARMK
+120.6%
+376.9%
-32.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -0.3% | -1.0% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.9% | +0.4% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +4.3% | -5.9% | +10.2% | +6.6% |
| 3M | +50.6% | +6.7% | +43.9% | +46.2% |
| 6M | +63.9% | +42.5% | +21.4% | +40.4% |
| YTD | +42.4% | +55.1% | -12.8% | +17.2% |
| 1Y | +92.1% | +50.3% | +41.8% | +59.7% |
| All | +497.4% | +120.6% | +376.9% | +316.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling