+89.2%
NTRA vs ARMK
+54.5%
+34.7%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +3.2% | -2.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +3.1% | -2.9% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +4.1% | -2.8% | +6.9% | +4.5% |
| 3M | +50.0% | +7.6% | +42.5% | +47.6% |
| 6M | +67.3% | +47.9% | +19.4% | +49.3% |
| YTD | +43.6% | +60.0% | -16.4% | +26.3% |
| 1Y | +89.2% | +52.2% | +37.0% | +67.0% |
| All | +89.2% | +54.5% | +34.7% | +67.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling