+82.4%
NTNX vs EPAM
+68.5%
+13.9%
-80.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.5% | +0.6% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -0.9% | +2.1% | +1.5% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +18.4% | -10.7% | +1.1% |
| 3M | +30.2% | +19.2% | +10.9% | +20.1% |
| 6M | +69.4% | -21.0% | +90.4% | +81.3% |
| YTD | +30.6% | -43.7% | +74.3% | +56.8% |
| 1Y | -10.0% | -29.9% | +19.9% | -1.0% |
| 3Y | +86.6% | -56.5% | +143.2% | +130.6% |
| 5Y | +57.1% | -81.7% | +138.8% | +151.0% |
| All | +82.4% | +68.5% | +13.9% | -48.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling