+73.7%
NTNX vs EPAM
-75.7%
+149.4%
-60.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.4% | -0.4% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +2.4% | +1.0% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -13.6% | +42.3% | -55.9% | -21.3% |
| 3M | -11.1% | +60.7% | -71.8% | -21.7% |
| 6M | +35.7% | +80.5% | -44.8% | +15.1% |
| YTD | +16.8% | -20.4% | +37.2% | +19.7% |
| 1Y | -9.1% | -9.6% | +0.4% | -9.6% |
| 3Y | +55.8% | -30.5% | +86.3% | +58.0% |
| All | +73.7% | -75.7% | +149.4% | +119.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling