+121.4%
NTAP vs UMAC
+494.0%
-372.6%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -3.1% | +3.2% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -7.7% | +7.1% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -26.4% | +30.5% | +4.3% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +61.9% | +26.1% | +85.2% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +86.5% | -10.9% | +72.3% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +156.3% | -97.4% | +55.1% |
| All | +121.4% | +494.0% | -372.6% | +119.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling