+116.9%
NTAP vs UMAC
+182.0%
-65.1%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -4.6% | +2.1% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +7.2% | -5.2% | +12.4% | +7.3% |
| 30D | -18.4% | -36.4% | +18.0% | -17.4% |
| 3M | -11.3% | -58.6% | +47.3% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +53.8% | -24.6% | +78.4% | +54.7% |
| YTD | +72.0% | -11.5% | +83.4% | +71.9% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | +16.9% | +51.1% | +67.1% |
| All | +116.9% | +182.0% | -65.1% | +118.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling