+119.1%
NTAP vs UMAC
+488.3%
-369.2%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -3.2% | +2.6% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -4.0% | +3.0% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -9.4% | +1.9% | -7.4% |
| 3M | +14.6% | +3.0% | +11.6% | +14.2% |
| 6M | +91.0% | +27.2% | +63.8% | +88.8% |
| YTD | +73.7% | +84.7% | -11.0% | +70.5% |
| 1Y | +51.2% | +136.5% | -85.3% | +47.8% |
| All | +119.1% | +488.3% | -369.2% | +117.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling