+131.1%
NTAP vs LDOS
+43.9%
+87.2%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.5% | -0.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -5.4% | +4.6% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +4.9% | -5.4% | -1.7% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +7.2% | -3.1% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +88.0% | -24.2% | +112.2% | +100.3% |
| YTD | +75.6% | -25.8% | +101.4% | +87.1% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | -24.7% | +83.6% | +68.4% |
| 3Y | +153.6% | +39.3% | +114.3% | +123.5% |
| All | +131.1% | +43.9% | +87.2% | +103.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling