+51.0%
NTAP vs LDOS
-31.2%
+82.2%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -2.3% | +2.2% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -15.1% | -7.2% | -7.9% | -15.0% |
| 30D | -28.1% | +16.8% | -44.9% | -28.7% |
| 3M | -11.4% | -1.6% | -9.9% | -11.1% |
| 6M | +52.2% | -1.0% | +53.2% | +52.2% |
| YTD | +60.4% | -25.8% | +86.2% | +64.3% |
| 1Y | +51.0% | -31.1% | +82.1% | +58.5% |
| All | +51.0% | -31.2% | +82.2% | +58.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling