+72.5%
NTAP vs GLXY
-41.9%
+114.3%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +5.2% | -5.4% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -15.1% | -14.6% | -0.4% | -13.8% |
| 30D | -28.1% | -36.2% | +8.1% | -25.2% |
| 3M | -11.4% | -30.1% | +18.7% | -9.0% |
| 6M | +52.2% | -56.1% | +108.3% | +61.7% |
| YTD | +60.4% | -38.9% | +99.3% | +62.5% |
| 1Y | +51.0% | -55.0% | +106.0% | +57.6% |
| All | +72.5% | -41.9% | +114.3% | +76.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling