+58.9%
NTAP vs GLXY
-55.4%
+114.3%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | +6.2% | -2.2% | +3.3% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.5% | -4.4% | -5.1% |
| 30D | -25.8% | -28.6% | +2.9% | -23.7% |
| 3M | -6.9% | -28.1% | +21.2% | -4.7% |
| 6M | +50.0% | -52.0% | +102.0% | +57.4% |
| YTD | +66.9% | -35.1% | +102.0% | +68.1% |
| All | +58.9% | -55.4% | +114.3% | +65.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling