+58.9%
NTAP vs GLXY
+8.0%
+50.9%
-24.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.6% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +13.4% | -14.2% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +38.1% | -38.6% | -3.5% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -7.3% | +11.4% | +4.1% |
| 6M | +88.0% | +8.2% | +79.8% | +83.8% |
| YTD | +75.6% | +17.8% | +57.8% | +67.3% |
| 1Y | +58.9% | +14.9% | +44.0% | +56.1% |
| All | +58.9% | +8.0% | +50.9% | +56.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling