-64.8%
NIO vs EPAM
-54.6%
-10.3%
-71.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.4% | +0.8% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -13.0% | +2.0% | -15.0% | -13.3% |
| 30D | -18.3% | +6.5% | -24.8% | -19.3% |
| 3M | -33.2% | +19.9% | -53.1% | -35.6% |
| 6M | -21.5% | -16.9% | -4.6% | -19.1% |
| YTD | -25.5% | -42.9% | +17.4% | -17.5% |
| 1Y | -38.0% | -30.4% | -7.6% | -35.5% |
| All | -64.8% | -54.6% | -10.3% | -62.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling