-52.7%
NIO vs EPAM
-4.9%
-47.7%
-55.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.9% | -3.9% | +9.8% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +5.6% | +13.4% | -7.8% | +6.9% |
| 30D | -4.2% | +47.1% | -51.3% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -26.3% | +71.2% | -97.5% | -23.1% |
| 6M | -42.5% | +48.9% | -91.5% | -40.4% |
| YTD | -33.5% | -22.2% | -11.3% | -37.0% |
| 1Y | -52.7% | -5.2% | -47.5% | -52.8% |
| All | -52.7% | -4.9% | -47.7% | -52.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling