-51.1%
NIO vs EPAM
-7.6%
-43.5%
-53.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | +4.7% | -8.5% | -3.4% |
| 7D | +2.8% | +18.8% | -16.0% | +4.3% |
| 30D | -8.4% | +44.9% | -53.3% | -6.0% |
| 3M | -32.0% | +68.6% | -100.5% | -29.4% |
| 6M | -43.9% | +65.4% | -109.3% | -41.3% |
| YTD | -35.7% | -19.9% | -15.8% | -38.2% |
| 1Y | -51.1% | -10.0% | -41.1% | -52.6% |
| All | -51.1% | -7.6% | -43.5% | -52.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling