-57.8%
NIO vs DAR
+32.2%
-89.9%
-67.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.9% | +2.2% | -8.0% | -6.4% |
| 7D | -4.7% | +9.2% | -13.9% | -6.8% |
| 30D | -14.3% | -12.3% | -2.1% | -11.6% |
| 3M | -32.8% | -12.7% | -20.1% | -30.9% |
| 6M | -49.8% | -12.8% | -37.1% | -48.6% |
| YTD | -40.2% | +53.8% | -94.0% | -48.2% |
| 1Y | -52.7% | +60.3% | -113.0% | -59.5% |
| All | -57.8% | +32.2% | -89.9% | -62.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling