-51.1%
NIO vs DAR
+65.2%
-116.4%
-53.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +5.1% | -6.3% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -1.8% | +3.6% | -5.4% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -6.6% | -11.3% | +4.6% | -5.1% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -13.1% | -16.8% | -28.9% |
| 6M | -46.6% | -15.1% | -31.5% | -45.5% |
| YTD | -36.5% | +50.5% | -87.0% | -46.8% |
| 1Y | -51.1% | +57.9% | -109.0% | -60.0% |
| All | -51.1% | +65.2% | -116.4% | -60.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling