+67.9%
NI vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+167.9%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.7% | +1.1% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -2.0% | +1.5% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -19.8% | +18.4% | -1.3% |
| 3M | -10.6% | -62.1% | +51.5% | -10.7% |
| 6M | -9.9% | -99.5% | +89.6% | -8.3% |
| YTD | +1.2% | -99.7% | +100.9% | +3.1% |
| 1Y | +4.4% | -99.9% | +104.3% | +6.5% |
| All | +67.9% | -100.0% | +167.9% | +68.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling