+3.4%
NI vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+103.3%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -7.1% | +7.0% | 0.0% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -5.4% | +5.5% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -24.8% | +23.4% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -10.6% | -62.8% | +52.2% | -10.5% |
| 6M | -9.3% | -99.5% | +90.2% | -3.1% |
| YTD | +1.1% | -99.8% | +100.9% | +9.7% |
| 1Y | +3.4% | -99.9% | +103.3% | +19.8% |
| All | +3.4% | -99.9% | +103.3% | +19.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling