+166.0%
NFLX vs HIMS
+183.3%
-17.3%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HIMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -0.4% | -5.0% | -5.3% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -3.9% | -0.3% | -3.9% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -12.4% | +17.9% | +6.5% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -1.1% | -3.0% | -5.1% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +68.4% | -89.1% | -27.6% |
| YTD | -16.5% | -14.7% | -1.9% | -17.9% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | -42.4% | +4.6% | -36.5% |
| 3Y | +77.9% | +304.5% | -226.6% | +17.5% |
| 5Y | +32.5% | +237.5% | -205.0% | -19.2% |
| All | +166.0% | +183.3% | -17.3% | +42.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HIMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HIMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HIMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HIMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling