+73.4%
NFLX vs HIMS
+317.3%
-244.0%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HIMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | +1.7% | -3.6% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.9% | -4.1% | -5.0% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -10.8% | +14.4% | +4.0% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +3.7% | -10.8% | -7.9% |
| 6M | -22.5% | +79.0% | -101.4% | -26.8% |
| YTD | -18.1% | -13.2% | -4.9% | -18.6% |
| 1Y | -38.3% | -43.3% | +4.9% | -37.0% |
| 3Y | +73.4% | +331.4% | -258.0% | +36.1% |
| All | +73.4% | +317.3% | -244.0% | +36.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HIMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HIMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HIMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HIMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling