-2.7%
NFLX vs ARMK
+96.3%
-99.0%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +4.5% | -7.7% | -4.9% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -2.6% | +4.8% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -9.0% | -5.2% | -3.8% | -7.6% |
| 3M | -14.0% | -6.5% | -7.4% | -12.5% |
| 6M | -28.2% | +15.3% | -43.4% | -33.4% |
| YTD | -32.4% | +43.6% | -76.0% | -43.3% |
| 1Y | -42.2% | +42.1% | -84.2% | -51.4% |
| 3Y | +45.9% | +94.0% | -48.1% | -0.6% |
| All | -2.7% | +96.3% | -99.0% | -40.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling