+39.8%
NFLX vs ARMK
+96.6%
-56.9%
-53.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +0.1% | -1.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +2.7% | -4.7% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -11.9% | -1.5% | -10.5% | -11.9% |
| 3M | -20.6% | -11.6% | -9.0% | -18.9% |
| 6M | -29.0% | +6.7% | -35.8% | -30.3% |
| YTD | -33.7% | +47.4% | -81.1% | -39.5% |
| 1Y | -46.2% | +41.5% | -87.6% | -50.5% |
| 3Y | +39.8% | +95.5% | -55.8% | +23.3% |
| All | +39.8% | +96.6% | -56.9% | +23.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling