-28.2%
NFLX vs ALHC
-60.0%
+31.8%
-30.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -2.9% | -0.4% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -9.0% | -14.2% | +5.1% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -14.0% | -45.1% | +31.2% | -12.4% |
| 6M | -28.2% | -59.5% | +31.4% | -26.2% |
| All | -28.2% | -60.0% | +31.8% | -26.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling