-42.9%
NFLX vs ALHC
-55.2%
+12.2%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.0% | +1.8% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +3.9% | -1.3% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -9.0% | -3.6% | -5.4% | -8.9% |
| 3M | -13.7% | -49.4% | +35.7% | -12.8% |
| 6M | -26.9% | -59.5% | +32.5% | -25.8% |
| YTD | -31.8% | -63.2% | +31.4% | -32.0% |
| All | -42.9% | -55.2% | +12.2% | -44.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling