+70.7%
NEE vs ABCL
+185.8%
-115.1%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -1.1% | +0.9% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -3.3% | +1.2% | -2.0% |
| 30D | +8.6% | -7.1% | +15.7% | +8.7% |
| 3M | -0.3% | +4.7% | -5.0% | -0.7% |
| 6M | -8.9% | +140.9% | -149.8% | -12.1% |
| YTD | +8.3% | +236.0% | -227.6% | +2.8% |
| 1Y | +4.3% | +217.4% | -213.1% | -0.9% |
| 3Y | +70.7% | +188.7% | -118.0% | +59.6% |
| All | +70.7% | +185.8% | -115.1% | +59.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling